Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

½ÇÇè³í¹®(¿øÀú³í¹®)| µå¸± ¹Ý°æ ¼³Á¤ÀÌ º¸Ã¶¹° °¡°ø¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ Çѱ¹¾î(KOR)

Effect of drill radius setting on prosthesis machining

´ëÇÑÄ¡°ú±â°øÇÐȸÁö 2018³â 40±Ç 1È£ p.1 ~ 8
±èÃѸí, ±è¼Ò¸®, Á¶¹ÌÇâ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±èÃѸí ( Kim Chong-Myeong ) - ½º¸¶À϶óÀÎ Ä¡°ú±â°ø¼Ò Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶ ¿¬±¸ÆÀ
±è¼Ò¸® ( Kim So-Ri ) - ½º¸¶À϶óÀÎ Ä¡°ú±â°ø¼Ò
Á¶¹ÌÇâ ( Cho Mi-Hyang ) - ¿ø±¤º¸°Ç´ëÇб³ Ä¡±â°ø°ú

Abstract


Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the trueness and fitness of machined prostheses according to drill radius setting in CAD software.

Methods: For this study, standard abutment were replicated in Type ¥³ stone. The stone abutment were scanned using a dental scanner. The CAD design software was designed using scanned abutment data. When designing, the drill radius was set to 0.3 mm and 0 mm, respectively, and saved. The saved design data was milled using a milling machine (n=13). The inner surface of the milled crown was scanned. The trueness and fitness were measured using the inner scan data of prostheses. Independent t-tests were performed to identify significant differences in each data.

Results: Trueness values of the data saved with 0.3 mm and 0 mm drill radius were 18.9 ¡¾2.3 §­ and 19.1 ¡¾0.9 §­, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups. Fitness values of the data saved with 0.3 mm and 0 mm drill radius were 65.5 ¡¾0.8 §­ and 33.8 ¡¾1.0 §­, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the groups (p<.05).

Conclusion : Setting the drill radius is important to produce clinically good fit prostheses.

Å°¿öµå

Dental CAD/CAM systems; Milling machine; Fitness; Three-dimensional evaluation; Trueness

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI